<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SuperMac War Story 9: Sales, Not Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steveblank.com/2009/04/30/1605/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/30/1605/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship and Conservation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Cavalcanti</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/30/1605/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Cavalcanti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 03:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/2009/04/30/1605/#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Hello Steve, great pst, tks for sharing your knowledge.

I´m reading (and enjoying a lot) your book &quot;the 4 steps...&quot;.

Best, Miguel Cavalcanti, from Brazil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Steve, great pst, tks for sharing your knowledge.</p>
<p>I´m reading (and enjoying a lot) your book &#8220;the 4 steps&#8230;&#8221;.</p>
<p>Best, Miguel Cavalcanti, from Brazil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall Smart</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/30/1605/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 07:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/2009/04/30/1605/#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Great story – your point about snazzy design vs. actual impact is still relevant in the context of spending money on outsourced web graphic design.  On the surface, it might seem difficult to quantify the value of good design – however, as per your article, I don&#039;t see any reason why contracts with designers wouldn&#039;t be structured in such a way that target conversion rates, bounce rates, and other metrics would drive the compensation level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great story – your point about snazzy design vs. actual impact is still relevant in the context of spending money on outsourced web graphic design.  On the surface, it might seem difficult to quantify the value of good design – however, as per your article, I don&#8217;t see any reason why contracts with designers wouldn&#8217;t be structured in such a way that target conversion rates, bounce rates, and other metrics would drive the compensation level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Allred</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/30/1605/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Allred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/2009/04/30/1605/#comment-275</guid>
		<description>This is a really common pitfall. If you look at the top 3 online retailers by conversion rate, none of these are award-winning designs :

www.schwans.com
www.ftd.com
www.proflowers.com

However, they convert ~25% of visitors to customers. That&#039;s 10x what many websites convert. As your story demonstrates, this is easily testable, so no excuse for not improving purchase rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really common pitfall. If you look at the top 3 online retailers by conversion rate, none of these are award-winning designs :</p>
<p><a href="http://www.schwans.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.schwans.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ftd.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ftd.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.proflowers.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.proflowers.com</a></p>
<p>However, they convert ~25% of visitors to customers. That&#8217;s 10x what many websites convert. As your story demonstrates, this is easily testable, so no excuse for not improving purchase rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitriy</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/30/1605/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitriy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 08:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/2009/04/30/1605/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>When I read your post I thought not about “websites” or “social media”, but “landing pages” as the most relevant online/DM comparable.

As a pay-per-click marketer, now I will look at retail packaging as a source of ideas on landing page design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read your post I thought not about “websites” or “social media”, but “landing pages” as the most relevant online/DM comparable.</p>
<p>As a pay-per-click marketer, now I will look at retail packaging as a source of ideas on landing page design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nivi</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/30/1605/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Nivi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/2009/04/30/1605/#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of this post by Bill Flagg: &quot;Direct marketers produce ugly, cheesy, long-winded stuff that CONVERT better.&quot;

http://billflagg.blogspot.com/2009/04/better-converting-websites-marketing.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of this post by Bill Flagg: &#8220;Direct marketers produce ugly, cheesy, long-winded stuff that CONVERT better.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://billflagg.blogspot.com/2009/04/better-converting-websites-marketing.html" rel="nofollow">http://billflagg.blogspot.com/2009/04/better-converting-websites-marketing.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
