<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Change We Can Believe In &#8211; Reinventing the US Auto Industry: Open Source the Chevy Volt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship and Conservation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinB</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-4431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KevinB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-4431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;the Energy and EPA team. But they’re smart, let’s see what happens&quot;

That&#039;s the funniest thing I&#039;ve read on the Intertubes in years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the Energy and EPA team. But they’re smart, let’s see what happens&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the funniest thing I&#8217;ve read on the Intertubes in years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What else can we open source? &#124; The official QGIA blog.</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What else can we open source? &#124; The official QGIA blog.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] most successful entrepreneurs. He writes a great blog which I read frequently. One of his recent posts talks about the idea of open sourcing the Chevy Volt [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most successful entrepreneurs. He writes a great blog which I read frequently. One of his recent posts talks about the idea of open sourcing the Chevy Volt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolás Boullosa</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolás Boullosa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mahmoud

I agree with you on safety. There are also other concerns, such as economies of scale, production efficiency, etc.

Instead of a Lulu.com for cars, think how Nike allows the visitors of its shoes&#039; customization site to choose from a wide range of colors, designs, materials.

I wouldn&#039;t see it as a free-tunning movement, but more as a Web-2.0 improvement system. 

It comes to my mind the &quot;labs&quot; option in Gmail. The &quot;Volt Customization Platform&quot; would be the Gmail, and the customization options the &quot;labs&quot; option.

So safety wouldn&#039;t be compromised. I think you went too fast refuting such an idea.

Ask the writer of the post if he didn&#039;t invest in a company because they had &quot;too crazy&quot; ideas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mahmoud</p>
<p>I agree with you on safety. There are also other concerns, such as economies of scale, production efficiency, etc.</p>
<p>Instead of a Lulu.com for cars, think how Nike allows the visitors of its shoes&#8217; customization site to choose from a wide range of colors, designs, materials.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t see it as a free-tunning movement, but more as a Web-2.0 improvement system. </p>
<p>It comes to my mind the &#8220;labs&#8221; option in Gmail. The &#8220;Volt Customization Platform&#8221; would be the Gmail, and the customization options the &#8220;labs&#8221; option.</p>
<p>So safety wouldn&#8217;t be compromised. I think you went too fast refuting such an idea.</p>
<p>Ask the writer of the post if he didn&#8217;t invest in a company because they had &#8220;too crazy&#8221; ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahmoud</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahmoud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nicolas,

I would love to believe in that vision, but its far from reality. At the end of the day every person cant go out and build their own car based on the open sourced design for one simple reason; safety. I&#039;d be afraid to drive on a road full of DIY cars without them undergoing the rigorous safety testing. Having open source designs will democratize car building for current and aspiring car manufacturing ventures but not on an individual level.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicolas,</p>
<p>I would love to believe in that vision, but its far from reality. At the end of the day every person cant go out and build their own car based on the open sourced design for one simple reason; safety. I&#8217;d be afraid to drive on a road full of DIY cars without them undergoing the rigorous safety testing. Having open source designs will democratize car building for current and aspiring car manufacturing ventures but not on an individual level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahmoud</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahmoud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@deepa nice find...thanks for sharing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@deepa nice find&#8230;thanks for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolás Boullosa</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolás Boullosa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello,

It&#039;s such an interesting idea and it makes sense. 

I think the Volt open source platform could be managed through a Web 2.0-like community of users, that would allow citizens not only buy a car based on the open-sourced Volt, but built-it themselves with the pieces and improvements they prefer, taking in consideration their own personal necessities, preferences.

So instead of making one car for millions of people, it would be possible to build one ev for every person. 

Also, people successful with their designs could be able to earn some royalties, if they decide to do so!

So why one can go to Lulu.com to create his/her own book, or buy an Arduino motherboard and do whatever, and it&#039;s not possible to do the same with a car?

It&#039;s time to be brave. You guys are paying the taxes, so you should decide on the future of the Volt &quot;platform&quot;.

Nicolás Boullosa
ceo, *faircompanies (www.faircompanies.com)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s such an interesting idea and it makes sense. </p>
<p>I think the Volt open source platform could be managed through a Web 2.0-like community of users, that would allow citizens not only buy a car based on the open-sourced Volt, but built-it themselves with the pieces and improvements they prefer, taking in consideration their own personal necessities, preferences.</p>
<p>So instead of making one car for millions of people, it would be possible to build one ev for every person. </p>
<p>Also, people successful with their designs could be able to earn some royalties, if they decide to do so!</p>
<p>So why one can go to Lulu.com to create his/her own book, or buy an Arduino motherboard and do whatever, and it&#8217;s not possible to do the same with a car?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to be brave. You guys are paying the taxes, so you should decide on the future of the Volt &#8220;platform&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nicolás Boullosa<br />
ceo, *faircompanies (www.faircompanies.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepa</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deepa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, open sourcing of a car spec is already done in Netherlands.
Check out http://www.cmmn.org/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, open sourcing of a car spec is already done in Netherlands.<br />
Check out <a href="http://www.cmmn.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cmmn.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahmoud</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahmoud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve,

I believe its the right idea, just not the right time for two reasons. One, is that no one will be building cars anytime soon; they won&#039;t get the capital or government dollars. Tesla which has the best chance of pulling off a legitimate mass market car will barely make the cut to get some capital infusion from the government. Second and more importantly the brand. No one wants to build on top of a losing platform. The closest analogy would be cellphones and why developers choose the iphone platform over many others even though its not the most widespread in terms of handsets. If that blog post was written two years ago we would have had a different discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>I believe its the right idea, just not the right time for two reasons. One, is that no one will be building cars anytime soon; they won&#8217;t get the capital or government dollars. Tesla which has the best chance of pulling off a legitimate mass market car will barely make the cut to get some capital infusion from the government. Second and more importantly the brand. No one wants to build on top of a losing platform. The closest analogy would be cellphones and why developers choose the iphone platform over many others even though its not the most widespread in terms of handsets. If that blog post was written two years ago we would have had a different discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change We Can Believe In - Reinventing the US Auto Industry: Open &#8230;&#160;&#124;&#160;Open Hacking</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Change We Can Believe In - Reinventing the US Auto Industry: Open &#8230;&#160;&#124;&#160;Open Hacking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the original post:  Change We Can Believe In - Reinventing the US Auto Industry: Open &#8230;    This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 15th, 2009 at 7:00 am and is filed under Cars, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post:  Change We Can Believe In &#8211; Reinventing the US Auto Industry: Open &#8230;    This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 15th, 2009 at 7:00 am and is filed under Cars, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Barr&#8217;s Blog &#187; Links for Wednesday, April 15, 2009</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Barr&#8217;s Blog &#187; Links for Wednesday, April 15, 2009]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Steve Blank: Change We Can Believe In - Reinventing the US Auto Industry: Open Source the Chevy Volt - &#8220;I proposed that in exchange for the GM bailout we spin out the Chevy Volt into an open source electric car platform. Any automaker who builds the car in the U.S. will be able to build on the Volt Platform, but all drivetrain improvements are open source.&#8220; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Blank: Change We Can Believe In &#8211; Reinventing the US Auto Industry: Open Source the Chevy Volt &#8211; &#8220;I proposed that in exchange for the GM bailout we spin out the Chevy Volt into an open source electric car platform. Any automaker who builds the car in the U.S. will be able to build on the Volt Platform, but all drivetrain improvements are open source.&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael F. Martin</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael F. Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But the biggest problem with the Volt is that customers don&#039;t want electric cars right now.  And as a policy matter, it&#039;s silly to spend time and money promoting 300 MPG cars over 30 MPG cars when you get more energy savings getting people to trade 20 MPG cars in for 30 MPG cars.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the biggest problem with the Volt is that customers don&#8217;t want electric cars right now.  And as a policy matter, it&#8217;s silly to spend time and money promoting 300 MPG cars over 30 MPG cars when you get more energy savings getting people to trade 20 MPG cars in for 30 MPG cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael F. Martin</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael F. Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worth a try...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth a try&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gibbs</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Gibbs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I&#039;m not mistaken the Volt is targeted to be very expensive and most of the innovation in electric cars is in the battery. How much innovation has GM put into the battery so far? Maybe the public can be better served by the government just subsidizing battery research.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken the Volt is targeted to be very expensive and most of the innovation in electric cars is in the battery. How much innovation has GM put into the battery so far? Maybe the public can be better served by the government just subsidizing battery research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Buckbee</title>
		<link>http://steveblank.com/2009/04/15/bold-idea-for-reinventing-the-us-auto-industry-open-source-the-chevy-volt/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Buckbee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveblank.com/?p=1123#comment-116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple random thoughts:

1. The Chinese auto market currently treats all other cars as an open platform to build off of anyway (without paying any royalties). As proof, checkout this gallery of images:

http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0810/gallery.china_cars.fortune/index.html

2. To make an analogy to the tech world. I think the Chevy Volt is to Netscape as Tesla is to Firefox: faster moving, more refined and a better more appealing experience. 

Thanks, 

Mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple random thoughts:</p>
<p>1. The Chinese auto market currently treats all other cars as an open platform to build off of anyway (without paying any royalties). As proof, checkout this gallery of images:</p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0810/gallery.china_cars.fortune/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0810/gallery.china_cars.fortune/index.html</a></p>
<p>2. To make an analogy to the tech world. I think the Chevy Volt is to Netscape as Tesla is to Firefox: faster moving, more refined and a better more appealing experience. </p>
<p>Thanks, </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

